Tire wheel combo
cowboydren@b15sentra.net
cowboydren@b15sentra.net
Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:36:53 -0500
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:21:02PM -0500, Qualudia101@aol.com wrote:
> I need advice from you experts out there. What is advisable, considering
> overall interest is acceleration performance with improved looks for
> primarily street driving.............I live in Nevada.
Tire Size Comparison
Spec Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference
185/60-14 4.4in 11.4in 22.7in 71.4in 887 0.0%
195/50-15 3.8in 11.3in 22.7in 71.2in 889 -0.3%
205/40-16 3.2in 11.2in 22.5in 70.5in 898 -1.2%
In my experience, a 1.2% difference is barely noticible. If anything,
the worst that could happen would be that you start over-compensating
for a shorter tire, and get nabbed for speeding because you felt
confident that 75 at the needle was under 70 at the road, and were
wrong. Nevermind.
> Considering price I'm looking into Konig Helieums 10.5LBS(15") and I think
> 12.5LBS (16") or Axis VPD's which weigh 12LBS and 14LBS I think
> respectively.
Sheesh, can I have some money? Seems like you have a little to spare.
;) In my not so humble opinion, 16" rims on a Classic are entirely too
cool. If it doesn't rub, I love the look. Another alternative that
should cost a lot less money and you wouldn't be giving too much in
weight is the Kosei K1 Racing. TireRack.com has them, as do many other
mail order vendors.
The only thing against a 16" wheel and tire combo is that it will weigh
slightly more than a 15" setup. Would this be compensated for by the
smaller rolling diameter? On a car with an automatic transmission, I
doubt you could feel the difference anyway.
--
-=|JP|=- "It's like a koala crapped a rainbow in my brain..."
'01 B15 SE/PP | http://members.cardomain.com/cowboydren/ | <//><
'95 SL2 Auto | cowboydren @ b15sentra . net |