SR20 20th ?!?

[Ivan Chou]

That's a good point.  The EVO is far too pricey, even though I like what
they've done with the MR model.  The B13 SE-R was what, $14-15K new?  The
sleeper factor was one of the major qualities.  The best match I'd say in
today's equivalent price range ($18-20K) is probably the Mazda 3s or the
Civic Si sedan.  I really like the Honda Fit: small, nimble, and < 2500
lbs.   If only they could boost the engine output a little bit to oh, say,
around a 2.0L 140-HP engine? :)

Ivan

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:49 AM, R. Blair Judson <purenergy at excite.com>
wrote:

> Do you really think so? To me, the EVO is expen$ive, way more powerful,
> and alot heavier. No one makes a lightweight, inexpensive, fun to drive,
> giant killer anymore (except for Lotus, but that really doesn't count as
> inexpensive).
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed 02/13, mike kojima < choaderboy2 at yahoo.com > wrote:
>
>
> The EVO is the car that captures much of what the old
> SE-R was about.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com*
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> The mailing list home page is http://www.se-r-list.org/
> To modify your subscription, go to http://lists.deskmedia.com/se-r/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://dm2.deskmedia.com/pipermail/se-r/attachments/20080214/d8b6ea7a/attachment.html