SE-R Replacement

[Eric Waterman]

That WRX must have been a 2.0, not the 2.5.  Our Forester when it had the
stock turbo, had no lack of torque and turbo lag was very small.  With the
new turbo, it has a bit more lag, but not that bad that you have to keep the
revs up for it to pass people.

Eric Waterman

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Wayne <wc701lists at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> blitzmr2 at insightbb.com wrote:
> > Plain-ol WRX is extremely well-proportioned performance-wise. Perfect
> performance/daily IMHO.
> > Safer than an Evo to boot. : )
>
> I was given a WRX for an "over night test drive" in May 2006 when I was
> looking for a new car.  I ran the SHIT out of in in the 24 hours.  I was
> fun off the line, but torqueless in around town driving.  It was
> torqueless at highway speed, too.  I bought the RSX-S instead.  It's
> also a slug.  Now considering V6 Accord, Miata or BMW 1.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> The mailing list home page is http://www.se-r-list.org/
> To modify your subscription, go to http://lists.deskmedia.com/se-r/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://dm2.deskmedia.com/pipermail/se-r/attachments/20080215/077f0200/attachment.html